A research paper examines what happens to an AI agent's behavior when the underlying model is replaced, a transition that product teams make often and usually without telling the humans who depend on that agent. The researchers find that behavioral drift happens without warning: the agent answers in new ways, makes different decisions, and produces different outputs. Nothing visible to the human changed. The human has no signal that the agent they trusted yesterday is not the same agent running today. The paper frames this as an identity problem. The agent's visible surface, its name, its interface, its stated purpose, stays constant while its actual behavior shifts underneath. This gap between apparent identity and real behavior erodes trust in ways that are hard to attribute. The human cannot easily tell whether a surprising output came from the task, their input, or a model change they were told nothing about. For designers and product leads, the practical question the paper raises is: who is responsible for surfacing model changes to the humans who depend on agents? The researchers argue for preserving behavioral continuity across model transitions, but the interface problem is at least as real as the technical one. A human cannot adjust their trust, their oversight, or their judgment unless they know something changed.