“Show quality, cost, speed and safety as a profile, not one number.”
One number is easy to read and hides the trade a change made. A prompt that answers better and costs twice as much is a decision, not an improvement. Four changes side by side keep that decision with the person instead of burying it in a weighted average the team did not agree on.
The Context Matrix
Where this principle has been tested. Untested cells are honest gaps, not passing grades — seen evidence for one? Tell us.
| Chat | IDE | CLI | Canvas / Doc | Ambient / Background | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | |||||
| Knowledge Work | ◐ | ||||
| Consumer | |||||
| Enterprise Ops | |||||
| Creative |
● supports · ◐ boundary · ✕ violates · blank untested
Linked Patterns
Boundary Conditions
- knowledge-work × canvas-doc × supervised
Win and tie rates collapse the comparison to one figure per candidate.
Evidence
Score, cost and latency as separate deltas.
Win and tie rates collapse the comparison to one figure per candidate.
The Agents & Humans Briefing
Agentic experience design, coding agents, MCP, and the signals that matter — weekly, free, in about five minutes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.